Back
Total Score
Reviewed by 4 scientists
Evidence
Balance
Clarity
Share on Twitter

Reviews

JD
Jonathan Davies
Reviewed on 9 May 2023
4
Evidence
6
Balance
7
Clarity

The language is clear and accessible, but there is no referencing or evidence linked to the discussion points. However, I think the balance is generally good on making sure people understand the positive and negative attitudes towards GM tech. BUT they do not emphasise that most scientists do not think GM is going to be harmful for onward food consumption.

2
Thank you for reporting this comment, this will be passed on to administrators.
AF
Alice Franklin
Reviewed on 10 May 2023
5
Evidence
7
Balance
9
Clarity
1
NC
Nicholas Clifton
Reviewed on 10 May 2023
3
Evidence
2
Balance
2
Clarity

Test review 4

0
Thank you for reporting this comment, this will be passed on to administrators.
RB
Rosemary Bamford
Reviewed on 15 May 2023
3
Evidence
9
Balance
2
Clarity

Test review

0
Thank you for reporting this comment, this will be passed on to administrators.